Taxonomy term

Wall Street Systems

Corporate Treasury: Approaches to In-House Banking

Read more about Corporate Treasury: Approaches to In-House Banking

Report date:

21 Apr 2026

Commentary

Cash pooling and sweeping is one of the most basic and widespread tools in modern cash management. To the extent allowed under exchange controls and regulations, it is important to bring all the liquidity into a central entity, and avoid having cash balances earning little to no interest, while some entities are borrowing and paying spreads.

By definition, this central entity performs the functions of a bank: it is taking deposits and making loans - for tax reasons, it needs to pay and charge interest on the balances. This also means it faces a lot of the challenges banks have: it needs good systems to track the loan balances and calculate and post the interest, and it also needs to ensure any FX exposures are properly identified and managed. Of course, it also needs to have access to sufficient group funding to meet the group’s net cash needs.

Unsurprisingly, once they have set up the relevant structures, many treasurers find they can be used to provide additional functions: POBO (Payment On Behalf Of) is quite common; ROBO (Receive On Behalf Of) exists but is less frequent. Some, but not all, have used their in-house banks to eliminate intercompany netting: any transaction between group companies gives rise to a debit or a credit to their accounts with the IHB, which will be cash settled or not in accordance with regulations and cash management policies. The central entity can also be used for FX management, executing trades with the market and doing back-to-back intercompany hedges.

In this call, peers went through the systems they use, and gave a frank assessment of the benefits and drawbacks of IHBs – it is not all plain sailing.

To read the rest of this commentary - please Log In or Register for basic membership (free)

Topics covered in this report:

in-house bank, Netting, Cash Pooling - cross border, POBO/ROBO, Funding, Hedging FX, Virtual accounts

Service providers discussed in this report:

Chatham Financial, Citi, FIS, Wall Street Systems, Kyriba, SAP, TIS, SWIFT

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Corporate Treasury Technology Roadmaps

Read more about Corporate Treasury Technology Roadmaps

Report date:

1 Sep 2023

Commentary

Technology is changing the way many businesses work: with online commerce, many traditionally B2B businesses are moving to B2C. Logistics and supply chains are being transformed. Ride hailing and food delivery services operate real time payment systems. Assets we used to buy are increasingly available as a service, often linked to the internet of things.

Where are our banks in this turmoil? And how are treasurers adapting? We wanted to get a first view. Judging by the response we received, we are clearly not alone in being very interested.

This report is long – even the summary takes several pages, and it does not capture all the nuances. It is well worth reading the detail – it clearly lays out the challenges treasurers are facing.

Business transformation

For the time being, treasurers are adopting a wait-and-see approach to business changes. When the business moves to B2C, or becomes a full asset as a service enterprise, treasury will adapt accordingly. In the meantime, treasurers see no need to get ahead of the business, or even necessarily be a change agent.

On the other hand, CXC members who are in the new, online enabled industries are, of necessity, proving to be early adopters of the new technologies.

Communicating with banks

Over the years, centralised global and regional treasury management has been enabled by online banking tools with balance reporting, remote account management and payment initiation.

This has brought enormous benefits to treasury management. But it is not perfect:

Mostly, the data is not real time. It is often yesterday’s balance and transactions
There are many different tools: host to host, e-banking systems, SWIFT reporting, APIs
Security protocols remain a conce

Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.

If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.