Cash Repatriation

Treasury & Banking in India

Report date: 
25 Apr 2022

Commentary

This call took place against the background of the war in Ukraine – but it was a useful chance to catch up on the ever improving situation in India.

India has always been complex, with many regulations and poor clarity. This is clear from the comments below, where participants often have different experiences on the same topic. But, overall, the economy is working well, people are making profits (this was not always the case), and regulations are becoming more user friendly, even if they remain challenging.

Business structure: most participants have one legal entity which faces customers, and a different one which acts as an international shared service centre, invoicing other companies in the group on a cost plus basis. This can lead to inefficiencies in cash management: everyone struggles with domestic cash pooling and intercompany loans, while the shared service centre has guaranteed profits and cash generation. One participant has all activities in the same legal entity, which makes life easier.

Intercompany loans within India create transfer pricing and tax challenges: there is a required or recommended interest rate of 8%, compared to deposit rates of 4% to 4.5%.

Cross border cash pooling and intercompany loans are generally very difficult: many approvals are required. Dividends are subjected to withholding tax of 15%, which is sufficient to deter some, but not all, participants from paying dividends. However, this is an improvement on the previous 22% dividend tax, which was often not creditable against tax in the receiving country.

Netting of intercompany invoices is not allowed. However, one participant is using an Indian entity to centralise all invoices within the country using a POBO/ROBO process, and limiting the transactions to a single, large, gross in/gross out settlement. They are also looking at a non resident INR account.

Participants mostly use deposits for investing their excess cash. One is using the TIDE deposit: the bank automatically sweeps fixed amounts of cash above a defined threshold into deposits. These receive a higher rate if they remain for more than two weeks, but can be released if needed, with a lower interest rate being paid.

Most participants use international banks, mainly Citi and BNPP. Most complained that Citi are reluctant to...please sign in to continue reading

Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)

Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & Banking in Ethiopia

Report date: 
22 Mar 2022

Commentary

Ethiopia is a deeply troubled country: it was the site of a major famine in the 1980s, and has a long history of civil and other wars, which have resulted in some former regions now being independent states. It has also had a series of revolutions, and turmoil continues to this day.

In these circumstances, business is – unsurprisingly – difficult, with foreign currency being difficult to access. Despite this, participants generally have successful businesses, with a remarkable consistency in approach and problems:

  • Most businesses provide infrastructure type hardware products. Typically, the hardware is sold outside the country, and paid for in hard currency. Warranty and maintenance services have to be provided onshore and billed in local currency – it is very difficult to remit the profits back to HQ, and trapped cash builds up.
  • The hardware imports are usually covered by LCs – but these can be expensive (up to 11%), and difficult to obtain. It is also not unusual for their settlement to be late, by up to nine months is one case.
  • No international banks operate in the country. This leads to the following issues:
    • The local banks often do not speak English, and have a tendency not to turn up for meetings when they have been arranged.
    • This often results in a need for face to face meetings, which can be challenging, with current travel restrictions
    • There is a need to recruit and maintain local staff to manage the resulting relationships – most treasurers do not like doing this.
    • Most processes are...please sign in to continue reading
Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Pages