Bank Accounts

Banking & Cash Management in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates

Report date: 
18 Jun 2025

Commentary

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. These two countries draw a lively and enthusiastic participation every time we discuss them: they are important markets, due to their wealth, but they have historically been quite challenging. Despite their strong financial position and stable currencies, their regulations can be difficult to manage – and their position at the heart of a region of massive geopolitical tension adds to the complexities.

Saudi Arabia, while sitting on massive oil reserves, has always been very conservative. It only began allowing 100% foreign ownership of companies in many sectors in 2019: most MNCs worked via distributors, joint ventures and representative offices. So the economy is relatively open, but MNCs often have a weaker presence than would normally be expected. With recent political changes, many rules have been relaxed. Tourism and inward investment are encouraged and there are some truly massive infrastructure investments. As companies establish their onshore presence in the country, they are even required to establish a regional headquarters.

The UAE has always been more open, though this varies amongst the seven emirates which compose it. The two main ones are Dubai, which has always been a major port and trading centre, especially between India and East Africa, and Abu Dhabi. Dubai is the most open, and has traditionally welcomed foreigners and foreign investment: it is where most of our peers have operations – often managing the region - and where it is easiest for them to work.

Corporate Treasury & Banking in Saudi Arabia

Most of our corporate treasury peers are setting up RHQs in Saudi, as required by the legislation. Many of the challenges they face are part of the process of transitioning from an offshore mode of operations using distributors and representative offices, to being fully onshore. To some extent, the same can be said of the international banks.

Though the currency is pegged to the US dollar, and freely convertible, there are challenges:

  • Cash pooling is only allowed with official....
Please LogIn /Register to access the full commentary and a further 150+ similar commentaries. If you already receive our newsletter - use your email to LogIn / Request Password Reset
Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Approaches to Investing short-term cash in Corporate Treasury

Report date: 
22 Apr 2025

Commentary

Risk versus reward. 

Treasurers face this eternal trade-off directly when investing short term cash. There is pressure to increase earnings, and a constant search for new solutions, but the priorities remain, in order:

  1. Safety
  2. Liquidity
  3. Yield

Companies put a lot of effort into making money and bringing in cash: the potential downside to losing money outweighs any yield benefit risky investments may bring.

As always, there is a lot of complex detail, depending on the size, the cash balance and the culture of the company.

  • Most companies have a formal investment policy, often approved by the board.
  • One of the benefits of centralising cash is to avoid paying the bid/offer spread of having cash in one place, and debt in another. Several peers used notional pooling (BMG and JPMorgan were mentioned) to achieve this. Both banks offer deposits for the cash in the pool.
  • The most used instruments are bank deposits and MMFs (Money Market Funds). A few peers invest directly in high quality sovereign bonds, as well as repos. The rules can be more flexible in highly regulated countries, such as Turkey and Angola.
  • Some peers used bank deposits as a means of balancing wallet share with relationship banks, but most take advantage of the higher rates provided by MMFs.
  • Others left pools of cash in different countries and regions: in these cases, the short term investments were frequently managed by a team in central treasury.
  • One peer managing Latin America was pleased with the better yield offered by some currencies with higher nominal interest rates, though this was not a common approach. Most of the commonly used instruments are available in...

 

Please LogIn /Register to access the full commentary and a further 150+ similar commentaries. If you receive our newsletter - use your email to LogIn / Request Password Reset

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Mexico - Corporate Treasury Update

Report date: 
12 Jan 2024

Commentary

In many ways, Mexico is a paradox. It has a vital, and complicated, relationship with its northern neighbour: apart from anything else, migration across its land border into the USA is a significant, and highly contentious, topic in US domestic politics.

But the reality is that Mexico has a thriving economy, and has modernised its financial and banking infrastructure to the point where the consensus on the call was that it is a country where it is relatively easy to work, and where most modern treasury management techniques can be used. There are no exchange controls, cash can be freely transferred across the national borders, and cross border cash pooling is regularly practiced. FX hedging can be done freely both onshore and offshore, and the country is well banked, with both good local banks and most international banks being well represented.

Despite this overall positive environment, we still had a lively call. There are a series of challenges, and some points were not always totally clear. None is particularly serious, but they still take up management time and attention:

  • Citibank operate through a relationship with Banamex. While this works well, several participants reported service level issues, and there were challenges with data not being transmitted through the IT systems. This resulted in manual interventions which should not have been required.
  • Consistent with their global strategy, Citi/Banamex are withdrawing from the retail banking sector. For some participants, this caused a problem, as banks in Mexico share the Latin American practice of giving employees a better deal on their retail banking services if the company pays payroll through them.
  • Otherwise, some participants reported issues setting up and managing local
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.
Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & Banking in India

Report date: 
25 Apr 2022

Commentary

This call took place against the background of the war in Ukraine – but it was a useful chance to catch up on the ever improving situation in India.

India has always been complex, with many regulations and poor clarity. This is clear from the comments below, where participants often have different experiences on the same topic. But, overall, the economy is working well, people are making profits (this was not always the case), and regulations are becoming more user friendly, even if they remain challenging.

Business structure: most participants have one legal entity which faces customers, and a different one which acts as an international shared service centre, invoicing other companies in the group on a cost plus basis. This can lead to inefficiencies in cash management: everyone struggles with domestic cash pooling and intercompany loans, while the shared service centre has guaranteed profits and cash generation. One participant has all activities in the same legal entity, which makes life easier.

Intercompany loans within India create transfer pricing and tax challenges: there is a required or recommended interest rate of 8%, compared to deposit rates of 4% to 4.5%.

Cross border cash pooling and intercompany loans are generally very difficult: many approvals are required. Dividends are subjected to withholding tax of 15%, which is sufficient to deter some, but not all, participants from paying dividends. However, this is an improvement on the previous 22% dividend tax, which was often not creditable against tax in the receiving country.

Netting of intercompany invoices is not allowed. However, one participant is using an Indian entity to centralise all invoices within the country using a POBO/ROBO process, and limiting the transactions to a single, large, gross in/gross out settlement. They are also looking at a non resident INR account.

Participants mostly use deposits for investing their excess cash. One is using the TIDE deposit: the bank automatically sweeps fixed amounts of cash above a defined threshold into deposits. These receive a higher rate if they remain for more than two weeks, but can be released if needed, with a lower interest rate being paid.

Most participants use international banks, mainly Citi and BNPP. Most complained that Citi are reluctant to...please sign in to continue reading

Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)

Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.