360T

Approaches to Investing short-term cash in Corporate Treasury

Report date: 
22 Apr 2025

Commentary

Risk versus reward. 

Treasurers face this eternal trade-off directly when investing short term cash. There is pressure to increase earnings, and a constant search for new solutions, but the priorities remain, in order:

  1. Safety
  2. Liquidity
  3. Yield

Companies put a lot of effort into making money and bringing in cash: the potential downside to losing money outweighs any yield benefit risky investments may bring.

As always, there is a lot of complex detail, depending on the size, the cash balance and the culture of the company.

  • Most companies have a formal investment policy, often approved by the board.
  • One of the benefits of centralising cash is to avoid paying the bid/offer spread of having cash in one place, and debt in another. Several peers used notional pooling (BMG and JPMorgan were mentioned) to achieve this. Both banks offer deposits for the cash in the pool.
  • The most used instruments are bank deposits and MMFs (Money Market Funds). A few peers invest directly in high quality sovereign bonds, as well as repos. The rules can be more flexible in highly regulated countries, such as Turkey and Angola.
  • Some peers used bank deposits as a means of balancing wallet share with relationship banks, but most take advantage of the higher rates provided by MMFs.
  • Others left pools of cash in different countries and regions: in these cases, the short term investments were frequently managed by a team in central treasury.
  • One peer managing Latin America was pleased with the better yield offered by some currencies with higher nominal interest rates, though this was not a common approach. Most of the commonly used instruments are available in...

 

Please LogIn /Register to access the full commentary and a further 150+ similar commentaries. If you receive our newsletter - use your email to LogIn / Request Password Reset
Topics covered in this report: 
Money Market Funds, Investing, Risk - counterparty, Bank Accounts
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Westpac, Bloomberg, JP Morgan, Bank Mendes Gans, spotfire, Blackrock, Cachematrix, FIS, 360T, Santander, Itau, Citi, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse, Pictet Asset Management

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Corporate Treasury, Banking & FX in India

Report date: 
1 Apr 2025

Commentary

Is India the next China? 

In our recent Expert Perspectives series on India, [view it here], DBS Bank stated they believe it is. 

  • Except for COVID, GDP growth is consistently above 5% [source: World Bank] 
  • The government is making efforts to streamline the bureaucracy which has always been a challenge, and move it online.
  • Manufacturing is being encouraged – India has long been a big provider of services. This requires an investment in infrastructure.
  • Following COVID, there has been a big move towards a cashless society, with an advanced electronic banking system.
  • There is comparatively little movement in FX: exchange controls remain in place. However, most transactions can be executed, including cross border loans and hedging – though cross border cash pooling is still very much forbidden. However, there is still a significant administrative burden.
  • As part of the opening up, India has established a form of free trade zone, Gift City.

So – does this match our peers’ experiences?

  • We will get into the detail below: the full report [14 pages - available to premium subscribers] contains a lot of useful experiences. But, in big picture terms:
  • All peers view India as a major source of growth: some are investing in manufacturing. While no-one is considering scaling back in China, India has generally been earmarked for the next big investment, where it has not already happened.
  • Some peers have entities which are still losing ...

 

Please LogIn /Register to access the full commentary and a further 150+ similar commentaries. If you receive our newsletter - use your email to LogIn / Request Password Reset
Topics covered in this report: 
FX, Hedging FX, Funding, GiftCity, Bank Relationships, Collections - domestic
Service providers discussed in this report: 
DBS, Citi, JP Morgan, BNP Paribas, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, ICICI, HDFC, State Bank of India, Kotak Mahindra Bank, SWIFT, 360T, Bloomberg

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Managing Corporate Treasury with Spreadsheets

Report date: 
13 Mar 2025

Commentary

Technology. Treasurers love it – and love to hate it. We depend on it, and appreciate the help it provides. But the treasury technology landscape is complex and changing fast. Treasurers have very different views on the best tools and approaches: it can be a real challenge knowing where to turn.

This call was a departure from the usual discussions on the pros and cons of robots, different TMSs and ERP treasury modules, or how AI can improve your cash forecasting. Instead, we had some very motivated peers who passionately defended the benefits of the second oldest treasury technology (after calculators!): spreadsheets. These peers’ comments bore out the conclusion from our ongoing Treasury Technology Benchmark: spreadsheets are very much alive.

Everyone understands the drawbacks with spreadsheets: they are prone to error, they are often not properly documented and can be changed too easily. They do not automatically provide sophisticated reporting tools, data is often entered manually (and potentially incorrectly), and access control can be a challenge. 

All these issues can be addressed – more below. But the peers stressed that...

 

Please LogIn /Register to access the full commentary and a further 150+ similar commentaries. If you receive our newsletter - use your email to LogIn / Request Password Reset
Topics covered in this report: 
Technology
Service providers discussed in this report: 
360T, Finastra, Kyriba, GTreasury, Bank of America, HSBC, CashAnalytics, ChatGPT, Python, Box, SharePoint, PowerBI, Excel, Trovata, HighRadius

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

FX & Treasury in Chile

Report date: 
31 Oct 2022

Commentary

For many years, Chile has been the poster child for Latin America: after a very difficult period in the early 1970s, it has become a haven for economic and political stability, with an economy which works well, few or no exchange controls, and an environment which is more business friendly than virtually any other country in the region.

The scenario has been somewhat tarnished since 2019, with violent public protests against rises in the cost if living, and a contentious referendum on changing the constitution – changes which were rejected by a large majority. However, in fairness, it must be said that the current constitution dates from the rule of General Pinochet, and the reaction of all political parties appears to have been that the proposal was too radical, and needs to be modified to reflect the wishes of the electors.

Against this background, all participants in the call confirmed that Chile is business friendly. For one, it has become a major market, while several others have made significant recent investments and acquisitions there. No participant has any serious doubts about the country or its future, and all view the absence of FX controls as greatly simplifying their lives.

However, all is not roses, mostly due to slow progress in administrative areas:

  • There is a lot of bureaucracy. In particular, FX trades must be reported to the central bank, even though they are all allowed.
  • The country seems to be slower than most in adopting digitalised banking. Wet signatures are required for virtually every payment and transaction, with no exceptions, even during COVID. This adds a layer of cost and inefficiency, which is surprising – Argentina and Brazil score better on this.
  • Most foreign banks seem to have a weak presence. Citi operates through a partnership with a local bank, Banco de Chile. This works quite well, but you have to ask, for example, to get the benefit of group pricing or to access Citi’s banking platforms. These are available through Banco de Chile, but they do not necessarily advertise the fact.
  • Many other foreign banks are present, notably Santander and HSBC. But it does not seem to be a focus market for them. 
  • The regulations are onerous, and
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password & LogIn
Topics covered in this report: 
Hedging FX, FX, Bank Relationships, KYC, Cash Pooling - cross border, Cash Pooling - domestic
Service providers discussed in this report: 
HSBC, Citi, Santander, BBVA, Bank of America, JP Morgan, Scotia, Banco de Chile, Banco BCI, BancoEstado, BancoSecurity, 360T, FXall, Deloittes

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & FX in Colombia & Peru

Report date: 
25 Nov 2021

Commentary

It is a rare pleasure to have a call on Latin America where the conclusion is that things work well, but that is the case with these two countries. This is even better news, given the turbulent pasts both countries have.

Of course, our Latin American treasurers always enjoy a lively discussion, and this session was no exception. It is still Latin America, so things will never be 100% plain sailing. 

Generally, funding is no problem. Extensive use is made of intercompany loans, and currency hedging is only complicated by the bouts of volatility. One participant has also encountered issues with the value dating of hedges.

The relationships with local banks are strong, and there is often resistance to centralising banking relationships. This usually results in a mix of local and international banks – the local banks are viewed as being necessary, anyway.

As this is Latin America, taxes and the bureaucracy can be onerous. In Colombia, people tend to use trustees to get round a financial transaction tax – the same tax exists in ...please sign in to continue reading

Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)
Topics covered in this report: 
Bank Relationships, Cash Repatriation, Corporate Treasury, FX, Political Risk
Service providers discussed in this report: 
360T, Banco Davivienda, BBVA, BNP Paribas, JP Morgan, Citi

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & Banking in India

Report date: 
25 Apr 2022

Commentary

This call took place against the background of the war in Ukraine – but it was a useful chance to catch up on the ever improving situation in India.

India has always been complex, with many regulations and poor clarity. This is clear from the comments below, where participants often have different experiences on the same topic. But, overall, the economy is working well, people are making profits (this was not always the case), and regulations are becoming more user friendly, even if they remain challenging.

Business structure: most participants have one legal entity which faces customers, and a different one which acts as an international shared service centre, invoicing other companies in the group on a cost plus basis. This can lead to inefficiencies in cash management: everyone struggles with domestic cash pooling and intercompany loans, while the shared service centre has guaranteed profits and cash generation. One participant has all activities in the same legal entity, which makes life easier.

Intercompany loans within India create transfer pricing and tax challenges: there is a required or recommended interest rate of 8%, compared to deposit rates of 4% to 4.5%.

Cross border cash pooling and intercompany loans are generally very difficult: many approvals are required. Dividends are subjected to withholding tax of 15%, which is sufficient to deter some, but not all, participants from paying dividends. However, this is an improvement on the previous 22% dividend tax, which was often not creditable against tax in the receiving country.

Netting of intercompany invoices is not allowed. However, one participant is using an Indian entity to centralise all invoices within the country using a POBO/ROBO process, and limiting the transactions to a single, large, gross in/gross out settlement. They are also looking at a non resident INR account.

Participants mostly use deposits for investing their excess cash. One is using the TIDE deposit: the bank automatically sweeps fixed amounts of cash above a defined threshold into deposits. These receive a higher rate if they remain for more than two weeks, but can be released if needed, with a lower interest rate being paid.

Most participants use international banks, mainly Citi and BNPP. Most complained that Citi are reluctant to...please sign in to continue reading

Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)

Topics covered in this report: 
Bank Accounts, Tide deposits, POBO/ROBO, Cash Repatriation, FX, Cash Pooling - domestic, Intercompany loans, Cash Pooling - cross border, Dividends, Netting, Tax
Service providers discussed in this report: 
JP Morgan, HSBC, BNP Paribas, Citi, ICICI, FXall, 360T, CoProcess

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.