Dividends

Commentary

With recent events, there has been less media focus on China. The news related to China has been about trade tensions with the US, the extent of China’s relationship with Russia, and the issues related to the real estate sector. Even COVID has tended to fade into the background, with the economic impact of the extended lockdowns and the disappointing pace of the recovery.

The purpose of this call was to find out how our members are finding the business and regulatory environment in China, and the extent to which their operations and treasury management are being impacted.

The overwhelming response was that it is very much business as usual – both in the good and bad respects. Participants on the call come from a variety of industries: while some, especially those facing the consumer, are seeing a significant slowdown, some continue to see growth. Everyone saw current difficulties as being transient, and nobody was looking to reduce their presence. The call quickly got into the operational challenges China presents – it was the familiar scenario of regulations which are always changing, are often not totally clear, and surprises.

• Chinese banks. One participant reported that one local bank, ICBC, had proved to be very proactive in helping their company automate several processes, using new technology. This is a big step forward, as Chinese banks have traditionally preferred to avoid this kind of engagement with foreign companies. 
• At the same time, there was a feeling that, as their traditional real estate lending activities have come under pressure, several Chinese banks are now more willing to lend to foreign companies.
• At the same time, most participants prefer to limit their relationships to the core foreign banks: this is becoming easier, as foreign banks are now able to provide services, such as the basic account, which used to be reserved to local banks. Several participants are reducing their banking relationships, usually focusing on core – international – banks.
• Also, participants reported that FX payments are being approved more quickly, and regulations seem to be easing – there was a lot of discussion about the requirement to bring the balance

Commentary

South Korea is a market which it is notoriously difficult for foreigners to penetrate: this applies as much to banks as it does to industrial companies. The culture is fiercely patriotic, and the vitality of South Korean industry means that most products are available from local companies, who are often world leaders.

The result is a situation where, despite the size of the economy – in 2021, it had the world’s 10th largest GDP, ahead of Brazil and Russia – it tends not to be a major market for most non South Korean MNCs. This was reflected in the call, where the country is complicated, and not a major focus for most participants. The situation is further complicated by language – English language skills can be rare amongst local staff and banks – and by a significant reluctance on the part of staff and customers to work with foreign banks. When you add in a series of specific, and very strong, local customs and processes, such as customers who often insist on making payments in person, you have a challenging situation.

Despite all of this, our participants manage to work successfully. Cross border cash pooling is possible, using the Consolidated Management of Funds (CMF) structure, which has to be approved by the Bank of Korea. The approval process is burdensome and requires a lot of work – and it all has to be done in Korean. But it works. 

Equally, dividends can be paid – but again, there is bureaucracy. Currency trades must be settled onshore, so many people find it easier to use the offshore NDF market, which is fairly liquid. Intercompany netting has to be gross in gross out – and the won can be remitted offshore. Cross border intercompany loans