Cash Pooling - domestic

FX & Treasury in Chile

Report date: 
31 Oct 2022

Commentary

For many years, Chile has been the poster child for Latin America: after a very difficult period in the early 1970s, it has become a haven for economic and political stability, with an economy which works well, few or no exchange controls, and an environment which is more business friendly than virtually any other country in the region.

The scenario has been somewhat tarnished since 2019, with violent public protests against rises in the cost if living, and a contentious referendum on changing the constitution – changes which were rejected by a large majority. However, in fairness, it must be said that the current constitution dates from the rule of General Pinochet, and the reaction of all political parties appears to have been that the proposal was too radical, and needs to be modified to reflect the wishes of the electors.

Against this background, all participants in the call confirmed that Chile is business friendly. For one, it has become a major market, while several others have made significant recent investments and acquisitions there. No participant has any serious doubts about the country or its future, and all view the absence of FX controls as greatly simplifying their lives.

However, all is not roses, mostly due to slow progress in administrative areas:

  • There is a lot of bureaucracy. In particular, FX trades must be reported to the central bank, even though they are all allowed.
  • The country seems to be slower than most in adopting digitalised banking. Wet signatures are required for virtually every payment and transaction, with no exceptions, even during COVID. This adds a layer of cost and inefficiency, which is surprising – Argentina and Brazil score better on this.
  • Most foreign banks seem to have a weak presence. Citi operates through a partnership with a local bank, Banco de Chile. This works quite well, but you have to ask, for example, to get the benefit of group pricing or to access Citi’s banking platforms. These are available through Banco de Chile, but they do not necessarily advertise the fact.
  • Many other foreign banks are present, notably Santander and HSBC. But it does not seem to be a focus market for them. 
  • The regulations are onerous, and
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password & LogIn
Topics covered in this report: 
Hedging FX, FX, Bank Relationships, KYC, Cash Pooling - cross border, Cash Pooling - domestic
Service providers discussed in this report: 
HSBC, Citi, Santander, BBVA, Bank of America, JP Morgan, Scotia, Banco de Chile, Banco BCI, BancoEstado, BancoSecurity, 360T, FXall, Deloittes

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & FX in Thailand

Report date: 
27 Sep 2022

Commentary

Thailand is a large and relatively prosperous country, with an area close to that of France and a population of nearly 70 million. It has a long tradition of fierce independence – it is the only country in the region which was never colonised. Today, the country participates actively in the global and regional economy – it is a member of ASEAN, but it retains a distinctive approach.

 

The result is a country which is modern and business friendly, but which continues to present some challenges. Generally, our participants find that it works: they are able to do cross-border funding into, and out of, Thailand, and include it in various cash pools. But there are remnants of FX controls – recently relaxed – and it can be challenging to know exactly what the rules are. 

 

Main highlights:

  • It is easy to convert Thai bhat (THB) into foreign currency, usually the USD. Traditionally, there have been documentation requirements, but many participants find these are being relaxed.
  • During the Asian crisis of 1997 to 1998, Thailand forbade the remittance of THB out of the country. This is now allowed, but apparently for the settlement of THB denominated invoices: the consensus was that it.......continues
Please Log in or set up a free registration to read the rest of this commentary Thailand, access all other commentaries and receive occasional free reports.

Topics covered in this report: 
Cash Pooling - domestic, Cash Pooling - cross border, Funding, Intercompany loans, intercompany netting, Investments
Service providers discussed in this report: 
HSBC, JP Morgan, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Kyriba

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Payment Platforms & Collections in China

Report date: 
22 Jun 2022

Commentary

Cryptocurrency, digital wallets, virtual everything – there is a huge amount of change. China has been at the forefront of a lot of digital trends, partly due to the fact it had an antiquated banking system which has been thoroughly modernised, and partly because the explosion of internet shopping in the country required a digital payments solution. This is a challenge when there are no credit cards. 

This report is based on a Treasury peer Call which explored how this is affecting members’ companies, and how they are adapting to this brave new, digital, world.

  • Most participants are accepting payment using WeChat Pay and Alipay. None is using these tools to make corporate payments.
  • The collections process using these tools is efficient and effective: you work with a third party (usually accessed via a banking provider), who will transfer the funds to your account the following day. One participant did an RFP, with two Chinese and two foreign banks, and found the service was identical – though pricing was different, and not transparent.
  • There was no mention of billbacks, the excessively high fees and acquirors which blight the use of credit cards in other countries
  • The one complaint all participants had was the difficulty linking this process to internal systems, for the reconciliation of receipts or for compliance purposes in terms of identifying the source of cash. The third party companies do provide detailed lists of payors, but it can be difficult to upload these into the ERP system.
  • There was a lot of discussion about....please sign in to continue
Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary on China and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)

Topics covered in this report: 
Payments - domestic, Collections - domestic, Bankers Acceptance Drafts, Crypto currency, eCNY, Entrustment loans, T&E Management, Supply Chain Finance, Cash Pooling - cross border, Cash Pooling - domestic
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Alipay, WeChat Pay, Bank of China, ICBC, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Citi, JP Morgan, Standard Chartered, Concur, Conferma, Kyriba

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & FX in China

Report date: 
14 Mar 2019

Included in this report: Entrustment pools, cross-border pooling, electronic BADs

Topics covered in this report: 
Entrustment loans, Bankers Acceptance Drafts, KYC, Invoicing, Cash Pooling - cross border, Cash Pooling - domestic, Bank Relationships, Supply Chain Finance, Funding
Service providers discussed in this report: 
SWIFT, ICBC, Bank of China

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & FX in China

Report date: 
25 Sep 2019

In this report: Netting, pooling, supply chain finance, customs guarantees, cash repatriation, Hedging, Local v International banks and T&E

Topics covered in this report: 
Netting, Cash Pooling - cross border, Cash Pooling - domestic, Customs, Cash Repatriation, Dividends, Hedging FX, Funding, T&E Management, Supply Chain Finance, Bank Relationships, KYC
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Alipay, WeChat Pay, ICBC, Bank of China, China Merchant Bank, Standard Chartered, Union Pay, HSBC, Citi, JP Morgan

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & Banking in India

Report date: 
25 Apr 2022

Commentary

This call took place against the background of the war in Ukraine – but it was a useful chance to catch up on the ever improving situation in India.

India has always been complex, with many regulations and poor clarity. This is clear from the comments below, where participants often have different experiences on the same topic. But, overall, the economy is working well, people are making profits (this was not always the case), and regulations are becoming more user friendly, even if they remain challenging.

Business structure: most participants have one legal entity which faces customers, and a different one which acts as an international shared service centre, invoicing other companies in the group on a cost plus basis. This can lead to inefficiencies in cash management: everyone struggles with domestic cash pooling and intercompany loans, while the shared service centre has guaranteed profits and cash generation. One participant has all activities in the same legal entity, which makes life easier.

Intercompany loans within India create transfer pricing and tax challenges: there is a required or recommended interest rate of 8%, compared to deposit rates of 4% to 4.5%.

Cross border cash pooling and intercompany loans are generally very difficult: many approvals are required. Dividends are subjected to withholding tax of 15%, which is sufficient to deter some, but not all, participants from paying dividends. However, this is an improvement on the previous 22% dividend tax, which was often not creditable against tax in the receiving country.

Netting of intercompany invoices is not allowed. However, one participant is using an Indian entity to centralise all invoices within the country using a POBO/ROBO process, and limiting the transactions to a single, large, gross in/gross out settlement. They are also looking at a non resident INR account.

Participants mostly use deposits for investing their excess cash. One is using the TIDE deposit: the bank automatically sweeps fixed amounts of cash above a defined threshold into deposits. These receive a higher rate if they remain for more than two weeks, but can be released if needed, with a lower interest rate being paid.

Most participants use international banks, mainly Citi and BNPP. Most complained that Citi are reluctant to...please sign in to continue reading

Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)

Topics covered in this report: 
Bank Accounts, Tide deposits, POBO/ROBO, Cash Repatriation, FX, Cash Pooling - domestic, Intercompany loans, Cash Pooling - cross border, Dividends, Netting, Tax
Service providers discussed in this report: 
JP Morgan, HSBC, BNP Paribas, Citi, ICICI, FXall, 360T, CoProcess

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Pages