Payments-digital

Commentary

Amongst treasurers, Latin America does not have a great reputation. Even if we have come a long way from the past of military dictatorships and very difficult regulations, it remains more complicated than many other regions. Peru, Colombia and Chile all have seen significant turmoil in the recent past.

So – where do we stand today? It says a lot that, on this call, the peers’ main concern was about whether to use local or foreign banks, and whether the FX rates for foreign remittances were better onshore or offshore. 

Of course, there are causes for concern, especially about the direction of the economy in each country. Peers gave different views on this, especially in Colombia. But, generally, the problems companies face are manageable:

• The biggest complaint was about the financial transaction tax in Colombia: as its name suggests, the “cuatro por mil” is a 0.4% tax on every money transfer above a monthly threshold. This can represent a significant cost when cash is being moved between banks, even within the same entity. There is a workaround which involves the use of a fiduciary: this does not work for transfers with third parties, and it blocks the cash for 24 hours. Another alternative for cross border international payments between subsidiaries is to settle them offshore.
• All peers are working to improve working capital. Factoring and supplier finance solutions are available, but factoring is felt to be expensive. 
• Other avenues for improving working capital include trying to use more modern payment methods. There was a feeling that these countries are maybe less...