DBS

Banking & Cash Management Challenges in South East Asia

Report date: 
10 Jul 2025

Commentary

ASEAN (The Association of South East Asian Nations) has a population of over 600 million. This is more than the EU (450m) or the United States (340m). Its ten member states provide an impressive level of diversity, for history and culture, but also in politics, economic development and prosperity. The broad range of rules and approaches make it a challenge to manage treasury operations. But the population, economic dynamism and key role in global supply chains make it a crucial player in world trade.

The pattern on this call is not a surprise: Singapore is the most advanced and open economy in ASEAN. For most companies, it is part of their international cash pooling and sweeping mechanisms, along with Hong Kong, Australia and, to some extent, China. The Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand are open economies, but they generally require FX to be executed onshore, and cash pooling is usually via intercompany loans: automated sweeping is not allowed. Vietnam remains more difficult. Myanmar, Cambodia and Laos, continue to be highly regulated and short of hard currency. 

Despite their FX restrictions, several countries have incentives for MNCs to set up Regional Treasury Centres (RTCs). These are usually able to transact outside the exchange controls – usually excluding domestic transactions.

Cash pooling: Singapore is the only country in ASEAN where cross-border cash pooling does not present any issues. Regional cash pools are usually based there or in Hong Kong. Most of the other countries allow domestic pooling and sweeping, though experiences vary. They typically do not allow automated cross border pooling, which is instead achieved by making intercompany loans, usually manually, and subject to various approvals. 

Exchange controls: most ASEAN currencies are convertible, at least for goods imports. However, in many cases (again, excluding Singapore), the FX trade has to be executed onshore, with the USD or EUR then transferred outside the country. These trades are usually done from an offshore location. Thai baht can be paid out of Thailand, but the regulation is not ...

 

Please LogIn /Register to access the full commentary and a further 150+ similar commentaries.
If you receive our newsletter - use your email to LogIn / Request Password Reset

 

Topics covered in this report: 
ASEAN, Bank Relationships, Cash Pooling - cross border, Cash Pooling - domestic, Trapped cash, KYC, Cash Repatriation, FX, Regional Treasury Centre, Regulatory relationships
Service providers discussed in this report: 
JP Morgan, DBS, Standard Chartered, Deutsche Bank, Citi, HSBC, Bank Ayudhya (MUFG), MUFG, Mizuho, Bank of America, Bank of PhilippineIslands, Bank Negara Malaysia, Bangkok Bank, Kyriba, Starfish Digital

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Bank Relationships & Cash Management in China

Report date: 
7 May 2025

Commentary

China is in the news a lot at the moment. Interestingly, this – well attended - call was very much in line with our usual discussions on the country: not a single mention of trade wars or tariffs. On the other hand, there was a lively discussion about all the usual issues related to pooling cash and managing banking relations – issues which show no sign of going away.

All peers on the call reported that business was strong, with most generating cash. They also repeated a theme familiar to people who know China: contrary to the common perception of a highly rigid and regimented society, there is a lot of confusion as to what the regulations actually are, and there are regular inconsistencies in how they are applied. 

This “summary” is long (the full report is 15 pages of granular detail): a lot of details were discussed, and these are generally appreciated. As always, these are the experiences and views of our peers, (lightly) edited for clarity.

The main topics:

  • Domestic cash pooling: many, but not all, peers practice this. However, they do all come up against limits related to the equity of the pool header. 
  • Cross-border pooling: this is where there is the most uncertainty.
    • There are two main schemes, operating under licences provided by either PBOC (People’s Bank of China) or SAFE (State Administration for Foreign Exchange). These have different quotas, rules and requirements and approval delays. 
    • There has been talk for some time that the two schemes will be merged, but there is little concrete evidence this is happening.
    • It has been suggested that, while existing schemes continue to operate, the approval of new ones has been slowed. Several peers are looking to implement new...
Please LogIn /Register to access the full commentary and a further 150+ similar commentaries. If you receive our newsletter - use your email to LogIn / Request Password Reset
Topics covered in this report: 
Cash Pooling - cross border, Cash Pooling - domestic, Bank Relationships, Bankers Acceptance Drafts, Money Market Funds, Investments
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Bank of America, Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of Ningbo, Citi, JP Morgan, Standard Chartered, HSBC, DBS, China Merchant Bank, ICBC, Union Pay, WeChat Pay, Alipay

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Corporate Treasury, Banking & FX in India

Report date: 
1 Apr 2025

Commentary

Is India the next China? 

In our recent Expert Perspectives series on India, [view it here], DBS Bank stated they believe it is. 

  • Except for COVID, GDP growth is consistently above 5% [source: World Bank] 
  • The government is making efforts to streamline the bureaucracy which has always been a challenge, and move it online.
  • Manufacturing is being encouraged – India has long been a big provider of services. This requires an investment in infrastructure.
  • Following COVID, there has been a big move towards a cashless society, with an advanced electronic banking system.
  • There is comparatively little movement in FX: exchange controls remain in place. However, most transactions can be executed, including cross border loans and hedging – though cross border cash pooling is still very much forbidden. However, there is still a significant administrative burden.
  • As part of the opening up, India has established a form of free trade zone, Gift City.

So – does this match our peers’ experiences?

  • We will get into the detail below: the full report [14 pages - available to premium subscribers] contains a lot of useful experiences. But, in big picture terms:
  • All peers view India as a major source of growth: some are investing in manufacturing. While no-one is considering scaling back in China, India has generally been earmarked for the next big investment, where it has not already happened.
  • Some peers have entities which are still losing ...

 

Please LogIn /Register to access the full commentary and a further 150+ similar commentaries. If you receive our newsletter - use your email to LogIn / Request Password Reset
Topics covered in this report: 
FX, Hedging FX, Funding, GiftCity, Bank Relationships, Collections - domestic
Service providers discussed in this report: 
DBS, Citi, JP Morgan, BNP Paribas, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, ICICI, HDFC, State Bank of India, Kotak Mahindra Bank, SWIFT, 360T, Bloomberg

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury, FX & Banking in Vietnam

Report date: 
10 Jul 2023

Commentary

There are some things in life which are always a fixed time in the future: the big joke about nuclear fusion is that it is 30 years away – and it was 30 years away back in 1970. Similar comments have been made about Vietnam’s economic potential: despite being hailed by many as the next China for economic growth, with its population of nearly 100 million people, and high levels of education and entrepreneurship, it has remained one of the more difficult places to do business and manage cash.

  • This call showed that the economy has made progress. Participants generally have businesses which are profitable and generating cash, and obtaining and remitting hard currency is not the major challenge it used to be. However, there is a lot of bureaucracy to be complied with, and it is not plain sailing.
  • Cash repatriation and trapped cash are issues. The only truly viable way of extracting cash from the country is via dividends – this means cash accumulates until the financial year has been closed, audited, and tax paid.
  • One participant has been involved in a situation where cash was repatriated via a prepayment of intercompany royalties – this required approval from the central bank.
  • Intercompany loans out of the country are
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.
Topics covered in this report: 
Hedging FX, Bank Relationships, Intercompany loans, Cash Repatriation, Trapped cash
Service providers discussed in this report: 
JP Morgan, Standard Chartered, HSBC, DBS, Citi, ANZ

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Regional Bank Relationships in Asia

Report date: 
2 Jun 2022

Commentary

The way treasurers manage banking relations provides a key insight into how they approach their job. This session was no exception – and we had the additional benefit of input from senior banker in Asia and Advisory Board member John Laurens, who shared his view from the other side of the fence.

  • Nearly everyone had the same goal: try to get the most efficient banking structure.
  • This nearly always involves a general preference for dealing with core international relationship banks over having many local relationships
  • However, one participant commented that local banks in Asia often have excellent technology and services – but it is difficult to get HQ to agree to go with them
  • In any case, there are many situations where local banks are still required, to support tax payments or local payment systems. China, India, Korea and Japan were the countries where this was most frequent.
  • In awarding business to banks, most companies tend to give a preference to the institutions who participate in credit facilities. Exceptions were made when justified by a specific service, but this could become an issue when credit needs increased.
  • Several participants have either recently restructured their banking relationships, or are currently doing so. Comments:
    • It is very important to get the local team on board. They will usually accept the outcome and help if they own the decision, and can see clear benefits.
    • The RFP process is useful, but it is important to carefully check the responses. One participant found that banks often tried to sell capabilities they did not yet have – it is important to focus on what they can deliver today. They also found it was beneficial to use...please sign in to continue reading
Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary on Regional Bank Relationships in Asia  and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)

Topics covered in this report: 
ASEAN, Bank Relationships, RFPs
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Citi, JP Morgan, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, Standard Chartered, ICBC, DBS, Bank of China

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.