PSP

Corporate Treasury & Banking in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan & Uzbekistan

Report date: 
26 May 2026

Commentary

The end of empires. With our usual exquisite timing, CompleXCountries held a call to discuss the Caucuses and Central Asia in the very week that China’s President Xi Jinping chose to remind the renowned and erudite classical scholar, Donald J. Trump, that this is an issue which goes back to classical Greece.

This region is not only the site of the ancient Silk Road, which China has been trying to revive for over two decades, but it has also changed hands between the Ottoman Empire and Russia.  Many populations still speak Turkic languages, and, as became apparent, Russian is still the main international language, despite the end of the Soviet Union. With recent events in the Persian Gulf, China’s Belt and Road initiative may still be transformative.

For most MNCs, the region today does not reflect geopolitical tensions: the countries are true “frontier markets”: in all the countries discussed – Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan – only one foreign bank has a presence, and that is limited to Citibank’s office in Kazakhstan. HSBC pulled out of Armenia in 2024. MNCs have to work with local banks, and need local teams to manage the relationships. Peers even have to use local payment acquirers. 

Economically, these countries are generally stable, but not booming. Azerbaijan is the exception with its oil industry. Hard currency is readily available. Remittances out of the region are an issue due to the burdensome bureaucracy which accompanies them, not because of restrictive exchange controls and shortages of hard currency.

One skill, however, is essential to manage business and treasury in these countries: an ability to communicate in Russian, which is still used much more in the region than English. Many of the local banks have web sites which are only in Russian, or have few, if any, staff, who speak English. Every peer on the call has at least one staff member who speaks the language.

Operating issues:

  • Many peers sell from an offshore entity. This simplifies the remittance issue: locally, they often have a representative office. Some peers manufacture the in region, but this is usually restricted to one or two countries.
  • Peers generally found the local banks to be quite ....Please Login / Register to read the rest of this Commentary.
CXC reports are based on confidential peer discussions between senior corporate treasurers sharing their solutions to complex treasury challenges.
Our commentaries, comprising the key findings from the reports are FREE to corporate treasury professionals - simply register here to apply for Basic Membership giving you access to 185+ commentaries and receive new commentaries direct to your inbox.
Our reports, available via subscription or individual purchase, are packed with practical, experience based learning allowing users to benchmark their operations and identify proven, actionable efficiencies - Read our Testimonials Here

 

 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

How MNCs manage Corporate Treasury in Turkey

Report date: 
22 Oct 2025

To read this commentary please Register or Log In.

CXC reports are based on confidential peer discussions between senior corporate treasurers sharing their solutions to complex treasury challenges.

Our commentaries, comprising the key findings from the reports are FREE - simply register to access 150+ commentaries and receive new commentaries direct to your inbox.

Our reports are packed with practical, experience based learning allowing users to benchmark their operations and identify proven, actionable efficiencies - please get in touch for details.

Topics covered in this report include:

  • Turkey’s recent economic conditions and inflation trends
  • Currency depreciation and exchange rate developments
  • Business and regulatory environment in Turkey
  • Tax structure and compliance challenges
  • Funding options and financing practices for companies
  • Use and impact of the Resource Utilisation Support Fund (RUSF)
  • Stamp duty and its implications for loans
  • Inter-company loans and cash management strategies
  • Hedging approaches and accounting under hyperinflation
  • Treatment of interest and foreign exchange transactions
  • Equity funding and capital management in subsidiaries
  • Cash pooling arrangements and restrictions
  • Role of international and local banks in Turkey
  • Bureaucracy and documentation requirements
  • Payment processing and local PSP requirements
  • Overall outlook and long-term confidence in the Turkish market

Banks discussed in this report include: Bank Mendes Gans, JP Morgan, Garanti, TEB, Citi, and ING

 

Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Corporate Treasury Payment Service Provider Relationship Management

Report date: 
24 Oct 2023

Commentary

“May you live in interesting times” goes the old Chinese curse. Whether we are cursed or not, we are certainly living in interesting times.

This call focused on one area of the information revolution – Payment Service Providers

(PSPs), but it was an illuminating insight into the challenges treasurers face. The multitude of payment methodologies and PSPs are forcing treasurers to deal with many different approaches, companies and formats. Today digital sales are mostly for B2C transactions, but this is spreading to B2B as business models evolve.

As treasuries move to APIs, bots and other less structured forms of communication, everyone will face the issues discussed in this report (the full 18 page report is available to premium subscribers - enquire here for details).

The biggest issues participants raised are:

  • Ownership. Treasury clearly owns the relationship with traditional banks. But many treasurers find that marketing or other functions (notably IT) sign up the company for a PSP relationship, and then leave it for treasury to resolve the issues. Participants are beginning to lay down rules for approving new relationships, usually involving marketing and IT.
  • Management system. One participant has a rigourous process which involves marketing, IT and treasury to make sure all aspects are covered.
  • Local vs global. Some PSPs are global, while others are regional, or purely local. The purely local ones are usually left to local or regional teams to manage, while global ones are typically managed from HQ. In some cases, only local options are available: this is a challenge for centralised treasuries.
  • Global PSPs. The main providers mentioned were PayPal, Ayden and WorldPay. No-one finds they can
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.