HSBC

Corporate Treasury ESG Practical Approaches

Report date: 
6 Dec 2023

Commentary

What do companies really think about climate change? What are they really doing?

This call on ESG was lively and gave us some valuable insights. I strongly recommend reading the detailed report. 

Two years ago, when we last discussed this, the main takeaways were:

  • Treasurers were interested in green bonds and financing, but very wary of the lack of clear standards
  • Treasury has a role to play, for example in selecting banks with good green credentials – but this needs to be part of an enterprise wide approach, which was often lacking.
  • The “E” part of the equation tends to receive more focus than the “S” and “G”.

This time, the discussion was very different. The reporting issues and the need for standards has received a lot of media attention recently – but our participants have mostly moved on. Interest in these products has waned: one participant said that, if investors consider the company to be green, the bonds will be priced accordingly, while another found it too hard to prove that the proceeds were being used in a green way. Green investments generally presented many issues, including tracking environmental credentials, and the need for unacceptably long tenors.

Instead, a picture emerged where:

  • All the companies represented have a real commitment to improving sustainability
  • Treasurers are finding it easier to collaborate with other functions for reporting, as ESG goals are becoming more central to corporate strategies. Though one participant finds the US focuses more on “S” and “G” than Europe. 
  • From an “E” perspective, European banks were seen as being more proactive than their US counterparts with BNP Paribas, Scandinavian and Dutch banks name checked as thought leaders.
  • Many companies are using VPPAs (Virtual Power Purchase Agreements) to help improve their carbon footprint. This tool, also known in the US as a REC
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.
Topics covered in this report: 
Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Corporate Treasury KYC & AML Issues and Approaches

Report date: 
29 Nov 2023
Topics covered in this report: 

Please email Rupert at rupert@complexcountries.com if you have any comments to add, or discussion points you would like to raise on this topic.

Turkey Corporate Treasury Update

Report date: 
20 Nov 2023

Commentary

Turkey is a challenging environment – but it works. Inflation is around 85%, the currency is depreciating rapidly and very expensive to hedge, and funding is regulated and very hard to obtain. Two years ago, restrictions were placed on the remittance of dividends, though today, those restrictions have been lifted and there are no formal exchange controls. 

Despite all this, participants on our call generally reported growing businesses, with positive results.

The main challenges:

  • Overdrafts are not available, or they are prohibitively expensive. This is not new: the country has always imposed cost penalties on short term borrowing. The central bank now requires a reserve deposit for all loans: one participant said this was 60%, while another reported 200%. Either way, this has effectively made local loans all but impossible.
  • One way of satisfying reserve requirements is to purchase Turkish government T-bills. No foreign bank is prepared to do this, so funding via international core relationship foreign banks is no longer possible. Local banks are generally also reluctant to lend: the few exceptions are government owned banks.
  • Bank deposits in foreign currency hardly receive any interest; local currency ones attract interest at around 30%, against an inflation rate of about 85%.
  • Given this, and given the high rate of inflation, there is a lot of pressure on working capital: customers are seeking longer payment terms, while suppliers are looking to be paid early. One participant has sought, without success, to put in place supply chain financing solutions.
  • Most participants manage to run their businesses with no debt. Cross border intercompany
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.
Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

China Corporate Treasury Update

Report date: 
13 Nov 2023

Commentary

With recent events, there has been less media focus on China. The news related to China has been about trade tensions with the US, the extent of China’s relationship with Russia, and the issues related to the real estate sector. Even COVID has tended to fade into the background, with the economic impact of the extended lockdowns and the disappointing pace of the recovery.

The purpose of this call was to find out how our members are finding the business and regulatory environment in China, and the extent to which their operations and treasury management are being impacted.

The overwhelming response was that it is very much business as usual – both in the good and bad respects. Participants on the call come from a variety of industries: while some, especially those facing the consumer, are seeing a significant slowdown, some continue to see growth. Everyone saw current difficulties as being transient, and nobody was looking to reduce their presence. The call quickly got into the operational challenges China presents – it was the familiar scenario of regulations which are always changing, are often not totally clear, and surprises.

  • Chinese banks. One participant reported that one local bank, ICBC, had proved to be very proactive in helping their company automate several processes, using new technology. This is a big step forward, as Chinese banks have traditionally preferred to avoid this kind of engagement with foreign companies. 
  • At the same time, there was a feeling that, as their traditional real estate lending activities have come under pressure, several Chinese banks are now more willing to lend to foreign companies.
  • At the same time, most participants prefer to limit their relationships to the core foreign banks: this is becoming easier, as foreign banks are now able to provide services, such as the basic account, which used to be reserved to local banks. Several participants are reducing their banking relationships, usually focusing on core – international – banks.
  • Also, participants reported that FX payments are being approved more quickly, and regulations seem to be easing – there was a lot of discussion about the requirement to bring the balance
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.
Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury, FX & Banking in Vietnam

Report date: 
10 Jul 2023

Commentary

There are some things in life which are always a fixed time in the future: the big joke about nuclear fusion is that it is 30 years away – and it was 30 years away back in 1970. Similar comments have been made about Vietnam’s economic potential: despite being hailed by many as the next China for economic growth, with its population of nearly 100 million people, and high levels of education and entrepreneurship, it has remained one of the more difficult places to do business and manage cash.

  • This call showed that the economy has made progress. Participants generally have businesses which are profitable and generating cash, and obtaining and remitting hard currency is not the major challenge it used to be. However, there is a lot of bureaucracy to be complied with, and it is not plain sailing.
  • Cash repatriation and trapped cash are issues. The only truly viable way of extracting cash from the country is via dividends – this means cash accumulates until the financial year has been closed, audited, and tax paid.
  • One participant has been involved in a situation where cash was repatriated via a prepayment of intercompany royalties – this required approval from the central bank.
  • Intercompany loans out of the country are
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.
Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury, FX & Banking in Egypt

Report date: 
3 Jul 2023

Commentary

Egypt has been through a tumultuous period recently, with significant economic and political turmoil, severe foreign currency shortages, and a generally difficult operating environment. In this situation, it is a relief that the country is making the headlines a lot less, so it was time to see where things stand.

Overall, the message which emerged is that the country is indeed stable, but that the recovery is taking longer than hoped. The main issue appears to be an IMF package which was agreed at the end of 2022, but whose implementation seems to be bogged down by disagreements over the timetable. Two key elements of the agreement are the liberalisation of the FX market, and the sale of some 32 companies which are currently owned by the government. Unsurprisingly, the government is seeking a longer time to execute the company sales, while foreign investors are waiting for the inevitable currency devaluation before making any significant asset purchases. It was not clear how the country would get out of this impasse.

This leaves our participants to manage through the current situation. Many are in industries which receive preferential treatment for FX, such as pharmaceutical or food related industries. However, even they frequently struggle to get FX allocations. Also, they run a variety of business models, with offshore sales in hard currency and imports for onshore sales in EGP both being common.

The picture which emerged was interesting:

  • The allocation of FX is not decided by the central bank. It is the decision of each bank. However, when a bank runs out of foreign currency, it can no longer process foreign remittances.
  • The main source of the country’s foreign currency is Egyptians working abroad, especially in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries. 
  • This means it is better to work with banks who have

Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.

If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.

Topics covered in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Banking & Treasury in Saudi Arabia

Report date: 
17 Apr 2023

Commentary

Saudi Arabia occupies a pivotal, and highly unusual, place in global politics and the world economy. As the world’s largest exporter of oil, and the holder of the second largest reserves of oil and gas, it is an essential part of the global economy – and has traditionally been relatively aligned with western and capitalistic countries. At the same time, it is a profoundly religious absolute monarchy, which practices a particularly conservative brand of Islam. This has always placed limits on its co-operation with western countries – limits which are being tested even more than usual in the current environment.

The current situation is particularly complex, as was clear in the call. Saudi Arabia has always imposed severe restrictions on foreign companies and banks, requiring local partners, and imposing local signatories and approvers for most, if not all, transactions. Limitations on where foreigners could live, and what they could do, have meant that many expatriate employees preferred to live with their families in Dubai, and commute to Saudi for the work week. However, the country has recently launched “Vision 2030”, which aims to open up the country and prepare it for a post oil future. This ranges from promoting tourism, allowing women to drive cars, and potentially allowing alcohol sales in specific places, to mega projects such as building a new city in the desert. It also includes pushing MNCs to transfer their regional headquarters to the kingdom. At the same time, foreign ownership is now allowed, either using a Saudi sponsor (with fees), or by paying 20% taxes. 

These developments are viewed positively by the participants – though several cautioned that there are many conflicting undercurrents in Saudi society, and the situation can always change at short notice. In all cases, Saudi Arabia is a large, and profitable, market, to which all our participants are fully committed, irrespective of the operational challenges.

Treasury practicalities:

  • Nearly all participants sell into Saudi from an offshore location, usually in USD. The currency is pegged to the USD, and there are no exchange controls, so things generally work well.
  • Several participants have opened local branches or subsidiaries, either to provide services or to act as sales offices, or technical offices to manage regulatory issues.
  • To participate in the mega projects being run by the government, it is a requirement to transfer any regional headquarters operation to the kingdom. There is direct competition with other countries in the region for this, particularly the UAE.
  • Saudi regulations state that the bank signatories and transactions mus
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password & LogIn
Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & FX in India

Report date: 
20 Feb 2023

Commentary

This Treasury Peer Call took place a few days after the announcement that India had officially overtaken China as the most populous country in the world. Given the increasing speculation that India might also replace China as the world’s fastest growing major economy, it seemed opportune to get a view on how things are developing.

All participants are bullish about their businesses in the country. Several already have significant operations, and most see major opportunities. The good news is that several participants are generating meaningful profits and cash – the bad news is that this creates issues in terms of cash investment and repatriation. And, of course, India is India – there are always plenty of regulations to navigate.

Main points and concerns:

  • For those companies who are generating cash, it is a challenge to invest it. Most retain a conservative approach, which means safe investments – these typically return a rate which is below inflation.
  • Cash repatriation is not without issues. The main vehicle is dividends: these attract withholding tax (the rate varies according to the jurisdictions), and are subject to complex tax rules. Cross border pooling is not allowed, and intercompany loans are subject to central bank approval.
  • Within India, cash pooling is
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password & Log in

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & FX in Bangladesh, Pakistan & Sri Lanka

Report date: 
20 Jan 2023

Commentary

Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka – three countries with sizeable populations and even bigger economic and social problems. They are difficult places to do business at the best of times – but they have become even more problematic with recent world events, limiting tourism receipts in Sri Lanka and restricting the apparel export business in Bangladesh.

The themes across the three countries were remarkably consistent, though there are variations in the detail:

  • For all our participants, these are important markets, so they are staying there, even though it is very difficult to get currency out. However, one participant is in the process of divesting their entity in Pakistan.
  • FX has always been an issue in these countries, but it has got worse recently. However, the prospect of an IMF package has led to some improvement in Sri Lanka.
  • Officially, none of the countries has strict exchange control regulations, but in practice, they are restricting the outflows of hard currency by a series of administrative measures. Goods imports tend to be prioritised over services, royalties and dividends.
  • In Pakistan, central bank approval is required for all
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password & LogIn

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

FX & Treasury in Turkey

Report date: 
29 Nov 2022

Commentary

Europe meets Asia in Istanbul – and Turkey is very much at the crossroads when it comes to a lot of the cultural, geopolitical and even military issues which are currently roiling the world. Despite all the turmoil, Turkey remains a relatively open and thriving economy, and it is a significant market in its own right for several participants.

Turkey has been struggling for several years with a high inflation rate, and this is causing issues for all the participants. Despite this, business seems to continue and be reasonably healthy for all of them. The high inflation rate causes a series of problems, but all participants are able to fund their businesses and repatriate cash. The challenges:

  • High interest rates, though these have now fallen to a little over 10%
  • Inflation officially at 85% - but unofficial estimates are up to 150%
  • Scarcity of bank funding: given the above, it is not surprising that banks are not willing to lend – especially as the central bank now requires a deposit of 30% of the amount lent, at 0% for the first 30 days.
  • Some participants have moved to cross-border intercompany funding, onshore intercompany loans between entities, and equity, as required.
  • One participant is looking at cross border intercompany funding from a subsidiary in a third country which has excess cash. The documentation is proving very challenging.
  • Accounting: officially, Turkey has hyperinflation (over 100% in the last three years), which means the HQ’s currency has to be used as the functional currency for accounting, under both IFRS and US GAAP.
  • Hedging:
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password & LogIn
Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Pages