Bank Relationships

Winding Down Russia: Treasury Challenges

Report date: 
29 Apr 2022

Commentary

This was our third call on the situation in Russia. It focused on the practical challenges people are facing: nearly all participants are either running down their businesses or continuing on humanitarian grounds for products which are exempted from sanctions, particularly in the healthcare sector. However, as one participant put it, winding down is easier said than done.

Many businesses operate through franchises in foreign countries. Terminating the franchise agreement may not be enough to stop them continuing the business and using the brand name – some high profile companies which have stopped operations still have franchisees who are continuing to trade, using the name.

In some cases, the name remains on the business. This makes it difficult for the brand owner to walk away, as the reputational risk remains.

People in the healthcare sector feel a need to carry on for humanitarian reasons. For them, there are significant logistical challenges getting new shipments into the country: no flights, very little sea freight, so heavy dependency on road transport, with limited willing suppliers. They are encountering an additional issue: sanctions apply based on customs codes, and some health care products have not been appropriately coded.

In other sectors, companies continue to sell down their existing inventory – but even this can be complicated, as fresh inputs can be required to make goods saleable.

Still other participants have operations which are purely local, and do not require imports. These will typically continue to function, though moves are being made to make them fully independent.

Despite all the above, most participants continue to be able to pay down intercompany debt, pay dividends and settle outstanding intercompany invoices.

Cash operations are complicated by the need to segregate payments emanating from sanctioned banks. Again, this seems to work, and customers are usually willing to transfer their payments to non sanctioned banks.

Many Russian entities have taken steps to disguise their real ownership as a means of evading sanctions: some participants are using a database to identify the true beneficial owners to see whether sanctions apply.

Most international banks continue to function, but SocGen recently announced it is selling Rosbank. This raises the concern it may be sanctioned in the future.

Most international banks are refusing to open new accounts, and none is interested...please sign in to continue reading 

Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)

 

Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & FX in Colombia & Peru

Report date: 
25 Nov 2021

Commentary

It is a rare pleasure to have a call on Latin America where the conclusion is that things work well, but that is the case with these two countries. This is even better news, given the turbulent pasts both countries have.

Of course, our Latin American treasurers always enjoy a lively discussion, and this session was no exception. It is still Latin America, so things will never be 100% plain sailing. 

Generally, funding is no problem. Extensive use is made of intercompany loans, and currency hedging is only complicated by the bouts of volatility. One participant has also encountered issues with the value dating of hedges.

The relationships with local banks are strong, and there is often resistance to centralising banking relationships. This usually results in a mix of local and international banks – the local banks are viewed as being necessary, anyway.

As this is Latin America, taxes and the bureaucracy can be onerous. In Colombia, people tend to use trustees to get round a financial transaction tax – the same tax exists in ...please sign in to continue reading

Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)
Service providers discussed in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & Banking in Iraq

Report date: 
29 Mar 2022

Commentary

As is evident from recent events, things can go wrong when one country invades another. Iraq is very much a case in point…..

Despite the serious and much reported security issues, all participants find it relatively easy to conduct business in the country. Foreign currency is readily available, and can be remitted out of the country, though things can slow down when the price of oil declines and dollars become scarcer. However, most participants do not have large operations, and they often sell their hardware offshore in dollars. 

There are operational challenges:

Relations between the Kurdistan region and Baghdad are not good: it can be very difficult to transfer cash between the two.

Not many foreign banks are very active in the country: Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) is one of the most active, and one of the few to be present in Baghdad and Kurdistan.

In Kurdistan, tax payments have to be made through...please sign in to continue reading

Please sign or set up a  free registration to read the rest of this commentary and get access to all CXC commentaries together with occasional free reports. (if you receive our updates, use your email to re-set your password)
Topics covered in this report: 

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Pages